• AgoraVox sur Twitter
  • RSS
  • Agoravox TV
  • Agoravox Mobile


En réponse à :


JFC JFC 24 juillet 2015 23:30

@Aristide
Oui, cette méprise est même documentée :
Do People Understand IARC’s 2B Categorizationof RFFields From Cell Phones ?

Peter M. Wiedemann, Franziska U. Boerner, Michael H. Repacholi
Bioelectromagnetics Volume 35, Issue 5, pages 373–378, July 2014
 Mobile phones may cause cancer, warn world health chiefs : After years of contradictory claims, an authoritative verdict. ”This and similar news headlines were published in May 2011 after the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) issued their official report, concluding that cell phone usage was “possibly carcinogenic to humans” [Baan et al., 2011]. (...) in many languages, the difference between “possibly carcinogenic ”(2B) and “probably carcinogenic” (2A) either does not exist or is difficult to explain. IARC is an international agency for cancer research, not a public health agency. Therefore, the categorizations made regarding human carcinogens were not supposed to be interpreted as public health messages, as they have been used recently.
etc.


Ajouter une réaction

Pour réagir, identifiez-vous avec votre login / mot de passe, en haut à droite de cette page

Si vous n'avez pas de login / mot de passe, vous devez vous inscrire ici.


FAIRE UN DON


Palmarès