• AgoraVox sur Twitter
  • RSS
  • Agoravox TV
  • Agoravox Mobile


En réponse à :


David Krauss 1er novembre 2007 20:22

La conclusion de la review où il est indiqué que l’hypothèse viral HIV n’est qu’une hypothèse qui n’est pas validée par les faits (? ???) :

Education Needs Widening

Pease concludes that the most pressing need now in the AIDS epidemic is education. This should not be confined to the promotion of condom use, though unprotected, promiscuous sex could clearly pose a risk. For the undeveloped world, it especially needs to focus on the bad medical practices that account for many deaths. And in the developed world, it needs to be understood and recognised that the evidence does not support the HIV concept, even though this has beenmarketed as established truth so effectively that there is now a world-wide demand for ‘‘anti-retroviral’’ drugs and for a prophylactic vaccine against a virus whose existence, in the form currently perceived, is not supported by the evidence.

Tall et Svenn que pensez vous de cette chercheuse qui a 30 de boulot derrière elle :

This book offers a new way forward in our understanding of AIDS and the mechanisms underlying it, which may be enormously important to future directions for research and treatment. Written by a medical microbiologist with more than 30 years of experience with ‘‘hands on’’ work, especially that involving electron microscopy, it makes extensive use of laboratory-acquired expertise and evidence to question the view that a retrovirus is responsible for the collapse of the immune system seen in AIDS. It describes a possible alternative mechanism in the initiation of AIDS, associated with infective agents but not in a conventional way, and proposes that the same mechanism may also be involved in some forms of cancer and arthritis.


Ajouter une réaction

Pour réagir, identifiez-vous avec votre login / mot de passe, en haut à droite de cette page

Si vous n'avez pas de login / mot de passe, vous devez vous inscrire ici.


FAIRE UN DON


Palmarès