International sources for technology and chemical precursors
The know-how and material for developing chemical weapons were obtained by Saddam’s regime from foreign firms.[16] By far, the largest suppliers of precursors for chemical weapons production were in Singapore (4,515 tons), the Netherlands (4,261 tons), Egypt (2,400 tons), India (2,343 tons), and West Germany
(1,027 tons). One Indian company, Exomet Plastics (now part of EPC
Industrie Ltd.) sent 2,292 tons of precursor chemicals to Iraq. The Kim
Al-Khaleej firm, located in Singapore and affiliated to United Arab Emirates, supplied more than 4,500 tons of VX, sarin, and mustard gas precursors and production equipment to Iraq.[17]
The provision of chemical precursors from United States companies to Iraq was enabled by a Ronald Reagan administration policy that removed Iraq from the State Department’s list State Sponsors of Terrorism. Leaked portions of Iraq’s « Full, Final and Complete » disclosure of the sources for its weapons programs shows that thiodiglycol,
a substance needed to manufacture mustard gas, was among the chemical
precursors provided to Iraq from US companies such as Alcolac
International and Phillips. Both companies have since undergone
reorganization and Phillips, once a subsidiary of Phillips Petroleum
and now part of ConocoPhillips, an American oil and energy company while Alcolac International has since dissolved and reformed as Alcolac Inc.[18]
On 12 March 2008, the democratic government of Iraq announced plans to take legal action against the suppliers of chemicals used in the poison gas attack.[19]
Voila, cette réponse argumentée vous convient-elle ?
Comment il a fait demandez-vous, et bien c’est simple en suivant votre lien Wikipédia vers celui traitant directement de Halabja que vous cité : http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halabja
Et on y trouve ceci :
"Le massacre d’Halabja n’a pas soulevé de protestation de la communauté internationale, en mars1988.
À l’époque, l’Irak étant l’allié des grandes puissances, ceux ci se
sont contentés de vagues condamnations, empêchant même sa condamnation
par sous-commission des droits de l’homme des Nations unies. Quant aux
États-Unis, une résolution adoptée à l’initiative du sénateur Claiborne
D. Pell a été bloquée par le président Georges Bush, qui a même donné
son consentement pour une nouvelle ligne de crédit de 1 milliard de
dollars."