@belis35

Votre ingénieur ne travaille pas pour la CIA, mais il aime visiblement faire parler de lui. Ces travaux principaux concernent le développement d’écrans souples. Ici nous avons affaire à un effet d’annonce relayé par certains media dans une démarche hautement politique. De nombreux ingénieurs, scientifiques et autres experts bien plus qualifiés et aux carrières autrement plus impressionnante se sont exprimés dans les dernières semaines (sans faire l’objet d’un tel relais par la presse aligné). La posture de défi de cet ingénieur est reprise comme une énième tentative pour persuader le public qu’il n’y a pas de question à se poser sur l’effondrement des tours. On notera également que cela ne résoud en rien la question du WTC7.

Quelques-une des communications évoquées, que n’ont pas relayé les média alignés :

on Sept. 4, Joel S. Hirschhorn, Ph.D., who served for 12 years as a Senior Staff Member of the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment and later as Director of Environment, Energy and Natural Resources for the National Governors Association, called for a new investigation of 9/11, saying « First, let the technical truth emerge. Then, if necessary, cope with the inevitable political, conspiracy and other questions. » Former Congressional Office of Technology Assessment Senior Staff Member Calls for New Investigation of 9/11
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_070905_former_congres sional.htm

On Aug. 27, Lynn Margulis, Ph.D., member of the National Academy of Sciences and world renowned scientist, characterized the official account of 9/11 as « a fraud » and called for a new investigation, « I suggest that those of us aware and concerned demand that the glaringly erroneous official account of 9/11 be dismissed as a fraud and a new, thorough, and impartial investigation be undertaken. » National Academy of Sciences Member Calls for New 9/11 Investigation
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_070906_national_acade my_of_.htm

An Aug. 21 article reported that James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of NIST’s Fire Science Division, called for an independent review of the World Trade Center Twin Tower collapse investigation. « I wish that there would be a peer review of this, » he said, referring to the NIST investigation. « I think all the records that NIST has assembled should be archived. I would really like to see someone else take a look at what they’ve done ; both structurally and from a fire point of view. ... I think the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable. » Former Chief of NIST’s Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_070820_former_chief_o f_nist.htm

On July 16, J. Marx Ayres, former member of the National Institute of Sciences Building Safety Council and former member of the California Seismic Safety Commission called for a new investigation of 9/11, « Steven Jones’ call for a serious investigation of the hypothesis that the WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by impact damage and fire, but through the use of pre-positioned ’cutter-charges’ must be the rallying cry for all building design experts to speak out. » Former California Seismic Safety Commissioner Endorses 9/11 Truth Movement
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_070715_former_califor nia_se.html

Bref, rien de nouveau sous le soleil, votre Dr Keith Seffen n’être rien d’autre qu’un jeune loup hautement politisé qui cherche visiblement à se faire mousser... Ces « travaux » sont attendus de pied ferme, d’ici-là, comme je l’ai dit, on est dans le simple effet d’annonce et la com pure...

voir ce fil :
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=11247&sid=88853b67a5f7919d5cbc658614815d89