Pour couper court aux interprétations hasardeuses
Les scientifiques indiens n’ont pas été obligés de supprimer leur étude, ils l’ont retiré ce qui signifie qu’elle n’a plus vocation à être discutée en l’état sur le site de prépublication.
Les auteurs l’ont retirée parce qu’ils ont constaté que ce papier avait fait l’objet d’une théorie du complot, avec de grave conséquences. Voilà la réponse du signataire de l’article Prashant Pradhan
« This is a preliminary study. Considering the grave situation, it was shared in BioRxiv as soon as possible to have creative discussion on the fast evolution of SARS-like corona viruses. It was not our intention to feed into the conspiracy theories and no such claims are made here. While we appreciate the criticisms and comments provided by scientific colleagues at BioRxiv forum and elsewhere, the story has been differently interpreted and shared by social media and news platforms. We have positively received all criticisms and comments. To avoid further misinterpretation and confusions world-over, we have decided to withdraw the current version of the preprint and will get back with a revised version after reanalysis, addressing the comments and concerns. Thank you to all who contributed in this open-review process.
: Authors of the Manuscript »
https://disqus.com/by/disqus_9vTYsrZnzD/
Contrairement à ce que prétend Montagnier, le papier n’a pas été censuré !