Et la conclusion qui n’est pas dans la version française :
OK, someone please explain that again
There is a machine used to pull out the fuel rod from the vessel, which fell into and stuck inside the vessel.
Q. Should open the cover of the vessel and take that out ?
A. If you do that, air comes into the vessel and touches the coolant, which makes a huge explosion.
Q. So should we extract the coolant first ?
A. Then the fuel cannot be refregirated and will explode.
Q. OK then, extract the fuel rod first
A. Like I told you, the machine for that operation screwed up
Q. Then what should we do !?
A. Nothing at the moment. The operation to collect the machine has been carried out for 24 times so far, which resulted in 24 times failure. We should wait till the fuel is refregirated. It will take for dacades. (The annual maintenance cost is 50 billion yen. Of course you cannot produce any electricity until then)
By the way, directly under the plant there’s an active fault.
And its constructure is highly weak at earthquakes. The end
http://www.niproid.com/2011/03/although-everyones-looking-at-fukushima.html
Un petit chef d’oeuvre de la nucléocratie ?