• AgoraVox sur Twitter
  • RSS
  • Agoravox TV
  • Agoravox Mobile


Commentaire de Nouvel auteur

sur Air Force One au dessus de New-York : c'était bien pour des photos (1) !


Voir l'intégralité des commentaires de cet article

Nouvel auteur 4 mai 2009 13:10

Vous parler Welsh.... et que dit-il ???
Le contraire de ce que vous affirmez dans votre article :

« One would think that the defeat of the most powerful military in the world by 19 stumblebum jihadists armed with box cutters would inspire a degree of humility and soul searching by the US Air Force. But you won’t find any of that in Air War Over America.

In fact, the amount of self congratulatory back slapping in the book is nauseating.

Nor is the book well written. Still, it has historical value for its content. The USAF commissioned the Air War Over America, and CONR’s Maj.General Larry Arnold wrote the Foreword. So, the book may be regarded as the official USAF record of 9/11.

What is noteworthy is that it conflicts in a number of respects — with the now official story presented in the 9/11 Commission Report. Bear in mind that Air War was published in 2003 — about a year BEFORE the release of the 9/11 Commission report.

According to Air War Over America, the first notice from the FAA came at 8:30 AM — which is 8 minutes earlier than what is stated in the 9/11 Commission Report. The difference is significant because this would easily have given NORAD time to intercept both Flights 11 and 175.

The book also mentions that Fl 77 was a possible hijack — indicating that NORAD knew about Fl 77 long before it crashed. This admission also flatly contradicts the 9/11 Commission Report.

The account of the Langley scramble is particularly valuable. According to F-16 Pilot Borgstrom they received an order just after take off to fly NNE — which means the F-16s were flying up the Chesapeake Bay — what you would expect. Then they got an order to fly NW and according to the author were »vectored toward Washington — instead of NY.« Again, this flatly contradicts the 9/11 Commission Report.

Borgstrom also notes that the 3 fighters from Langley were on different frequencies and »we were getting orders from a lot of different people.« This is important information and the 9/11 Commission should have followed up by interviewing the Langley pilots about their orders and conversations to reconstruct what happened. All the commission had to do was track the orders back up the food chain. But apparently this kind of simple detective work was too much for the official investigation to manage. There is scant mention of the Langley pilots’ testimony in the 9/11 Commission Report.

Neither Air War nor the 9/11Commission Report explains how the F-16s from Langley ended up flying in circles over the Atlantic. This omission alone should stand your hair on end »


C’est quoi ce genre de procédés ?
J’ai mis en gras les contradictions flagrantes avec ce que vous avancez.... Explications ???? smiley Ca va être dur je le sens... Flagrant délit de mensonge.


Voir ce commentaire dans son contexte





Palmarès