• AgoraVox sur Twitter
  • RSS
  • Agoravox TV
  • Agoravox Mobile


En réponse à :

RemiZ 23 août 2007 13:24

Retrouve sur un des commentaires du site mis en lieu par POUET himself :

"The evidence of his guilt is based upon three eyewitnesses who identified Conner from a police photographic spread. One of those witnesses was shot by the killer, the other two saw someone running from the scene. Considering that eyewitness testimony is the single most unreliable source of evidence and the fact that police officers and prosecutors from Harris County, Texas are notorious for influencing identifications, this is not persuasive evidence of guilt.

The evidence of a fingerprint match taken from the mouth of a soda bottle found at the scene is also highly questionable evidence. The fingerprints of the hand holding the bottle did not match Conner. The Harris County fingerprint laboratory is notoriously unreliable, and there is an unanswered question about exactly where the bottle came from.

The trial lasted ONE day. That was only seven years ago. The death warrant was issued for an execution date only seven months after the Circuit Court denial and before the judgement became final. This case is an illegal rush to judgement and a rush to execution. It is not reasonable to expect an appeal of this gravity to be mounted in seven months time."

Alors encore une fois : c’est pas un peu rapide de juger de la mort d’un homme de cette facon ??

Répondre Signaler un abus Lien permanent

Ajouter une réaction

Pour réagir, identifiez-vous avec votre login / mot de passe, en haut à droite de cette page

Si vous n'avez pas de login / mot de passe, vous devez vous inscrire ici.


FAIRE UN DON


Palmarès